Munetsi v Madhuyu and Another (16255/2024) [2024] ZAWCHC 209

Let’s explore the case of Munetsi v Madhuyu and Another (16255/2024) [2024] ZAWCHC 209 (6 August 2024).

Court and decision date

High Court of South Africa, Western Cape Division, Cape Town, 6 August 2024

Key facts

• The applicant, Mr Munetsi, sought urgent interdictory relief, an apology, and punitive costs against the respondents, Mr Madhuya and Ms Tonsani.
• The respondents had published a video and personal information about Mr Munetsi on social media platforms, which Mr Munetsi claimed was defamatory and breached his right to privacy.
• The respondents opposed the application and sought their own claims against Mr Munetsi, including monetary compensation and an order prohibiting further contact.

Legal questions

1. Should the court interdict respondents from broadcasting Mr Munetsi’s personal information and order them to remove the video from social media?
2. Is Mr Munetsi entitled to a public apology and punitive costs?

Court’s decision

The court granted an interdict prohibiting the respondents from broadcasting Mr Munetsi’s personal information. It also ordered they remove the video from all social media platforms. However, the court didn’t grant the applicant’s request for a public apology or punitive costs.

Reasoning

• Privacy breach: The court found that the respondents’ publication of Mr Munetsi’s cell phone number on social media constituted a breach of the POPIA and the common-law right to privacy. The court deemed the respondents’ actions unlawful dissemination of personal information, as defined by POPIA.
• Defamation: While the video contained defamatory content by calling Mr Munetsi “evil”, the court found that not all allegations were defamatory. The claim of Mr Munetsi being “evil” was recognised as defamatory, but the video’s broader content did not sufficiently support a defamation claim beyond that specific remark.
• Remedies: The court decided that a public apology was not a recognised remedy for privacy violations under POPIA. It also found that an interdict was sufficient to address the breach of privacy and defamation. Moreover, the court denied the applicant’s request for punitive costs as the applicant didn’t meet the burden for such an award

Practical impact on clients

This decision highlights the importance of safeguarding personal information and adhering to privacy laws such as POPIA. The ruling also underscores the need for businesses and individuals to:

1. be cautious when handling sensitive information; and
2. understand the boundaries of privacy and defamation laws.

Crucially, the decision clarifies that an interdict is an appropriate remedy for a breach of POPIA.

Recommended actions

1. Review and update policies: Ensure all social media and data handling policies comply with privacy laws like POPIA, including provisions for safeguarding personal information.
2. Monitor social media: Regularly monitor social media platforms for any unauthorised disclosures of personal information and have procedures in place for swift action if breaches occur.
3. Legal guidance: Understand the scope of defamation and privacy laws and develop strategies for addressing potential violations.
4. Training: To prevent similar issues in the future, provide training for your personnel on the legal implications of publishing personal information and defamation.

How ITLawCo can help

ITLawCo provides expert legal guidance on privacy and data protection laws such as POPIA. Our services include:

• Policy review and development: Review and update your data handling and social media policies to ensure compliance with privacy regulations.
• Incident response: Respond to data breaches and privacy violations, helping you manage and mitigate potential legal risks.
• Training programmes: Get customised training sessions to educate your staff on legal obligations related to personal information and defamation.
• Legal consultation: Get strategic advice on defamation and privacy issues, including preparing for and responding to legal disputes.

By leveraging ITLawCo’s expertise, you can better navigate the complexities of privacy law, reduce the risk of legal issues, and ensure robust protection for sensitive information. Contact us today.

Read the case

Find the case on Saflii.